EMPLOYMENT LAW BULLETIN – JANUARY 2024 – PRACTICAL PERSPECTIVES
The importance of early consultation with the workforce in redundancy situations
A recent Employment Appeal Tribunal decision reminds employers that it is important to share redundancy proposals with the workforce at an early stage. Failure to do so could make any resulting dismissals unfair. In Joseph de Bank Haycocks v ADP RPO UK Limited, the Claimant and the wider workforce were not consulted about redundancy proposals before pooling and scoring took place. The criteria for selection and the Claimant’s own scores were not provided to him before his dismissal. This information was, however, provided on appeal. The EAT held that the failure to consult at a formative stage meant that the dismissal was unfair, saying that ‘whilst the appeal could correct any missing aspect of the individual consultation process (e.g. the provision of the claimant’s …scores), it could not repair [the] gap of consultation in the formative stage’.
The EAT set out the following guiding principles for fair redundancy consultation:
- the employer will normally warn and consult either the employees affected or their representative.
- a fair consultation occurs when proposals are at a formative stage and where the employee is given adequate information and adequate time to respond, along with consideration being given to that response.
- in consultation, the purpose is to avoid dismissal or reduce the impact of redundancies.
- a redundancy process must be viewed as a whole, and an appeal may correct an earlier failing.
- it is a question of fact and degree as to whether consultation is adequate, and it is not automatically unfair that there is a lack of consultation in a particular respect.
- any particular aspect of consultation, such as the provision of scoring, is not essential to a fair process.
- the use of a scoring system does not make a process fair automatically.
- whether it is reasonable to show an employee the scores of others in a pool will be case-specific.
Employers seeking to carry-out a fair consultation process in a redundancy situation should take account of each of the points above and act appropriately from the very moment that redundancies are contemplated.
How should you deal with time off to donate blood?
Many employees choose to donate blood. Blood donation centres generally open beyond normal office hours so it is arguable that employees should not need to take any time off work in order to donate blood. However, what should you do if you are faced with a request from an employee for time off to donate blood?
Here are some pointers:
- does the business already have a policy in place to deal with time off to donate blood during working hours? If so, you should consult this and act accordingly.
- if there is no express policy in place, then is there a custom and practice that has been adopted in relation to time off for this reason? If so, then it is a good idea to follow any previous custom. Failing to do so, without good reason, could lead to allegations of unfairness and/or discrimination in appropriate cases. You should act consistently.
- if there is no express policy and no obvious custom or practice, then the legal position here is that time off to donate blood is not a legal right. It comes with no entitlement to claim the time off as sick leave – other than the time spent actually donating blood and a short rest period thereafter, the employee will not be prevented by sickness from working.
- although there is no legal right to time off to donate blood, you will want to make sure that your managers know how to handle any request. You could choose to adopt a supportive policy, allowing a short amount of paid leave during the working day in order to donate blood. Alternatively, you could make it clear that employees who want to give blood are expected to donate outside of their working hours, except for cases where there is an emergency request for donation.
- there are good reputational reasons that you may wish to promote and support time off for blood donation. It is an important civic duty and, if a supportive and encouraging approach is taken, this could increase employee morale.
Gender pay gap reporting
The Office for National Statistics (ONS) has released annual statistics on differences in pay between women and men by age, region, full-time and part-time status and occupation – compiled from its Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings. Its analysis of the gender pay gap is a measure across all jobs in the UK and is different from compulsory gender pay gap reporting by individual organisations.
Among all employees, as of April 2023, the total gender pay gap was 14.3%. This fell slightly from 14.4% in 2022. There remains a significantly higher gender pay gap among employees aged 40 and over, compared with those under 40 years. For age groups under 40 years, the gender pay gap for full-time employees is 4.7% or below. For age groups of full-time employees aged 40 and older, the gender pay gap is much higher, at 10.3% or more. The gender pay gap increased in 2023 across all age groups, except for those aged 18 to 21 years.
The gender pay gap is also larger among higher earners. For those earning at the 90th percentile, it is 14.8%, compared with only 3.1% for the bottom 10% of earners.
New legislation means criminal convictions will be ‘spent’ sooner
New legislation has come into force which will mean that criminal convictions will become ‘spent’ after a shorter time, reducing the period that individuals need to declare them to their employers. Section 193 of the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Act 2022 came into force with effect from 28 October 2023 and makes the following key changes to the previous position on declaring custodial convictions:
| Type of conviction | Previous length of time required to disclose following completion of sentence | New length of time required to disclose following completion of sentence |
| Custodial sentences of over 4 years | Never spent | 7 years although certain offences are exempt and never spent including offences classified in the Sentencing Code as ‘serious violent, sexual and terrorism offences’ |
| Custodial sentence of between 2 ½ years and 4 years | 7 years | 4 years |
| Custodial sentence of between 1 and 2 ½ years | 4 years | 4 years |
| Custodial sentence of between 6 months and 1 year | 4 years | 1 year |
| Custodial sentence of up to six months | 2 years | 1 year |
These new time periods will be extended in the event of re-offending during the declaration period.
The time periods of required disclosure are altered (and slightly lower) for each category where the offender was under the age of 18 at the time of conviction.
Employers should review any application forms and interview questions to make sure that these changes are reflected. The changes will not impact on any roles where basic or enhanced DBS checks are required.
New holiday pay rules: carry-over
The Employment Rights (Amendment, Revocation and Transitional Provision) Regulations 2023 have been published by the government and are due to come into force on 1 January 2024. One of the key areas covered in the Regulations is the question of whether accrued but untaken annual leave can be carried over from one holiday year to the next. The position is set out as follows:
- Regulation 13 annual leave (4 weeks per year) will carry-over in the following circumstances:
- if it is unable to be taken due to sickness, as long as it is used within 18 months.
- if it is unable to be taken due to the employee taking statutory leave (e.g. maternity, adoption and shared parental leave) it is carried over to the following holiday year.
- if the right to paid leave is not recognised, then it carries over until one year has elapsed where holiday is taken and paid correctly.
- if the employer doesn’t give reasonable opportunity to take leave or encourage it, then it carries over until one year has elapsed where holiday is taken and paid correctly.
- if the employer doesn’t warn employees of the risks of losing their holiday entitlement at the end of the holiday year, then it carries over until one year has elapsed of it being taken and paid correctly.
- The new leave entitlement for part-year and irregular hours workers under Regulation 15B Working Time Regulations 1998 have the same carry-over rules as Regulation 13 leave.
- Regulation 13A annual leave (1.6 weeks per year) will carry-over in more limited circumstances: where an employee is absent due to sickness (provided it is taken within 18 months) and where an employee is absent on statutory leave. There is also the possibility of agreeing carry-over of this portion of leave by way of a relevant agreement made with the employee.

